Re: (Semi-random) thoughts on device tree structure and devfs

To: Johnny Billquist <bqt%softjar.se@localhost>
Subject: Re: (Semi-random) thoughts on device tree structure and devfs
From: Masao Uebayashi <uebayasi%gmail.com@localhost>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:19:31 +0900

On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Johnny Billquist <bqt%softjar.se@localhost> 
wrote:
> No kernel rebuilding is neccesary.

You built non-GENERIC in the first place.

Masao

References:
- (Semi-random) thoughts on device tree structure and devfs
  - From: Masao Uebayashi
- Re: (Semi-random) thoughts on device tree structure and devfs
  - From: Quentin Garnier
- Re: (Semi-random) thoughts on device tree structure and devfs
  - From: Johnny Billquist
- Re: (Semi-random) thoughts on device tree structure and devfs
  - From: Masao Uebayashi
- Re: (Semi-random) thoughts on device tree structure and devfs
  - From: Johnny Billquist
- Re: (Semi-random) thoughts on device tree structure and devfs
  - From: Masao Uebayashi
- Re: (Semi-random) thoughts on device tree structure and devfs
  - From: Johnny Billquist
- Re: (Semi-random) thoughts on device tree structure and devfs
  - From: Masao Uebayashi
- Re: (Semi-random) thoughts on device tree structure and devfs
  - From: Masao Uebayashi
- Re: (Semi-random) thoughts on device tree structure and devfs
  - From: Johnny Billquist

Prev by Date: Re: (Semi-random) thoughts on device tree structure and devfs
Next by Date: Re: MI overrides of bus_dma(9), bus_space(9), pci(9)
Previous by Thread: Re: (Semi-random) thoughts on device tree structure and devfs
Next by Thread: Re: (Semi-random) thoughts on device tree structure and devfs
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index