[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: (Semi-random) thoughts on device tree structure and devfs
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 02:01:56AM +0900, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> > You need some kind of persistent state *somewhere*, to support chmod,
> > chown, mv, rm, etc. Or are you proposing to break those? That idea
> > strikes me as a pretty crippling regression.
> My devfs doesn't do that complicate thing. Mine is more or less procfs +
Wow, that sucks. Not being able to change permissions (and less importantly,
mv or rm the device files) would definitely be a problem.
Main Index |
Thread Index |