tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: openat/fstatat functions implementation

Adam Hamsik <> wrote:
> That must be a part from different patch from dh@. I have removed it  
> in current version. Look at current version of patch. It was cleaned up.

If we are going this way, I think we should not create a syscall for each
*at() function.  Rather have one generic to handle these cases (c.f. mouse's
suggested way).


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index