tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical keylocks

To: Marc Balmer <marc%msys.ch@localhost>
Subject: Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical keylocks
From: Matt Thomas <matt%3am-software.com@localhost>
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 13:23:16 -0700


On Aug 9, 2009, at 1:07 PM, Marc Balmer wrote:

The keyword then is "subsystem".

Why is it different from a subsystem like raidframe which is stillunder dev?

It is still dealing with a device, and therefore belongs under /dev.

Why on earth is everything contestet on NetBSD?



Because we strive to better.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical keylocks
  - From: Marc Balmer

References:
- re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical keylocks
  - From: matthew green
- Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical keylocks
  - From: Marc Balmer

Prev by Date: Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical keylocks
Next by Date: Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical keylocks
Previous by Thread: Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical keylocks
Next by Thread: Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical keylocks
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index