Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO revisited)

To: Matt Thomas <matt%3am-software.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO revisited)
From: Marc Balmer <marc%msys.ch@localhost>
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 19:33:57 +0200


Am 09.08.2009 um 19:32 schrieb Matt Thomas:

On Aug 9, 2009, at 10:03 AM, Marc Balmer wrote:
We can consider this issue solved. I can declare my functions as"__noinline static ...." and have both the benefits of a staticdeclaration and the function name show up in ddb's 'trace' command.
I will slowly convert my code to this idiom, if no one objects.
Please only do that if neither DIAGNOSTIC nor DEBUG is defined.


why do you suggest this?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO revisited)
  - From: Matt Thomas

References:
- GPIO revisited
  - From: Marc Balmer
- Re: GPIO revisited
  - From: Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
- Re: GPIO revisited
  - From: Marc Balmer
- static functions are your friends (Was GPIO revisited)
  - From: Matt Thomas
- Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO revisited)
  - From: Marc Balmer
- Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO revisited)
  - From: Adam Hamsik
- Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO revisited)
  - From: Marc Balmer
- Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO revisited)
  - From: Matt Thomas

Prev by Date: Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO revisited)
Next by Date: Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO revisited)
Previous by Thread: Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO revisited)
Next by Thread: Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO revisited)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index