Re: ia64 and emap

[Mindaugas Rasiukevicius <rmind%netbsd.org@localhost>]

yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
> >> We were able to obtain ubc_nwins and ubc_winshift.  Can we obtain
> >> uvm_emap_size?
> > 
> > I see, you are using these values to calculate required KVA. However,
> > is that a long term solution? I think it should be calculated in some
> > dynamic way (cf. x86 or other pmaps) i.e. it is MD problem, not MI.
> 
> do you mean that you are going to mandate the growkernel stuff?
> 

Fair point. It is a complicated bit of code. :)

However, do you disagree that it should be more dynamic? Or at least some
more generic/common way of KVA calculation across the architectures.

> YAMAMOTO Takashi

-- 
Mindaugas