[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: ia64 and emap
> KIYOHARA Takashi <kiyohara%kk.iij4u.or.jp@localhost> wrote:
>> > Do you have a backtrace?
>> Ooops. We have not implement command 'bt' yet. ;-)
>> It will speak information without the meaning...
> OK. :)
>> > Why do you want to make it global?
>> We were able to obtain ubc_nwins and ubc_winshift. Can we obtain
> I see, you are using these values to calculate required KVA. However,
> is that a long term solution? I think it should be calculated in some
> dynamic way (cf. x86 or other pmaps) i.e. it is MD problem, not MI.
do you mean that you are going to mandate the growkernel stuff?
> For now, I think it is okay to put some workaround, preferably in IA64
> pmap, commit your changes, and improve the pmap later.
Main Index |
Thread Index |