[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Proposal: B_ARRIER (addresses wapbl performance?)
On Oct 30, 2008, at 5:17 PM, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 01:28:21PM -0700, Bill Stouder-Studenmund
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 05:51:09PM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
The problem is that this won't help. Ordered tags will relate the
sequencing of commands relative to each other. The journal, however,
doesn't care about the relative ordering of operations, it wants to
when the writes to the journal have hit stable storage.
The key problem is that, on SCSI disks with the write cache
write command can complete by writing to the cache.
But SCSI disks don't lie like this unless explicitly configured to,
with proper use of tags, there is no need to configure them that way;
there is no performance benefit.
But it's so much safer to simply use FUA.
Main Index |
Thread Index |