Re: Proposal: B_ARRIER (addresses wapbl performance?)

To: tls%rek.tjls.com@localhost
Subject: Re: Proposal: B_ARRIER (addresses wapbl performance?)
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej%shagadelic.org@localhost>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 19:34:17 -0800


On Nov 1, 2008, at 8:46 AM, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:

I'd like an example of a SCSI (including FC or SAS) disk whichshipped withthe write cache enabled. I have never encountered this. The entirepointof SCSI-style tagged queueing is to make it unnecessary forperformance
reasons.

That's actually not the entire point of SCSI-style tagged commandqueueing.


-- thorpej

References:
- Proposal: B_ARRIER (addresses wapbl performance?)
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon
- Re: Proposal: B_ARRIER (addresses wapbl performance?)
  - From: Bill Stouder-Studenmund
- Re: Proposal: B_ARRIER (addresses wapbl performance?)
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon
- Re: Proposal: B_ARRIER (addresses wapbl performance?)
  - From: Bill Stouder-Studenmund
- Re: Proposal: B_ARRIER (addresses wapbl performance?)
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon

Prev by Date: Re: Proposal: B_ARRIER (addresses wapbl performance?)
Next by Date: Re: Proposal: B_ARRIER (addresses wapbl performance?)
Previous by Thread: Re: Proposal: B_ARRIER (addresses wapbl performance?)
Next by Thread: Re: Proposal: B_ARRIER (addresses wapbl performance?)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index