Re: Proposal for new syscalls: getrusagex and waitx

[David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 01:41:37AM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
 >     Date:        Sat, 18 Oct 2008 18:10:23 +0000
 >     From:        David Holland <dholland-tech%NetBSD.org@localhost>
 >     Message-ID:  <20081018181023.GA28689%netbsd.org@localhost>
 > 
 >   | > int waitx(pid_t wpid, int *status, int options, struct plistref 
 > *rusage);
 >   | 
 >   | That should be wait5, for consistency with the various other forms of
 >   | wait.
 > 
 > Huh?   Why.

wait, waitpid, wait3, wait4, the next version in sequence should be
wait5? Or maybe not.

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost