[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Status of revivesa
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 10:57:57AM -0700, Bill Stouder-Studenmund wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 04:58:46PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 02:32:46PM +0000, Andrew Doran wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 09:47:13PM -0700, Bill Stouder-Studenmund wrote:
> > >
> > > > I recently update revivesa to recent current, and things are almost
> > > > ready
> > > > for a merge.
> > >
> > > I think that would be premature, because:
> > >
> > > - The kernel panics ~instantly when I try to test it.
> > I get it too (running the netbsd-3 named):
> Can I get a copy of this? Or is it one of the released ones?
It's a 3.0_BETA of Wed May 25 15:51:00 UTC 2005. I guess a NetBSD 3.0
userland would do it too. But I can tar up this userland if you want it.
> > # /usr/sbin/named -v
> > BIND 9.3.0
> > # /usr/sbin/named
> > # uvm_fault(0xc5877b60, 0, 1) -> 0xe
> > fatal page fault in supervisor mode
> > trap type 6 code 0 eip c02d60df cs 9 eflags 10246 cr2 0 ilevel 7
> > kernel: supervisor trap page fault, code=0
> > Stopped in pid 12.2 (named) at netbsd:sa_getcachelwp+0x2f: movl
> > 0xc4(%ebx),%edx
> > db> tr
> > sa_getcachelwp(c5872588,c66e1f80,c65e3b5c,c02cb957,c66e1f82,0,c5872588,c03a4fa7,c66e1f80,0)
> > at netbsd:sa_getcachelwp+0x2f
> Ok, I'm confused. How was the kernel compiled? I'm guessing not
> DIAGNOSTIC... There are asserts that should make it clear as to what may
> be wrong here.
It's a XEN2_DOMU kernel. It has DIAGNOSTIC+DEBUG
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
Main Index |
Thread Index |