On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 04:58:46PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 02:32:46PM +0000, Andrew Doran wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 09:47:13PM -0700, Bill Stouder-Studenmund wrote: > > > > > I recently update revivesa to recent current, and things are almost ready > > > for a merge. > > > > I think that would be premature, because: > > > > - The kernel panics ~instantly when I try to test it. > > I get it too (running the netbsd-3 named): Can I get a copy of this? Or is it one of the released ones? > # /usr/sbin/named -v > BIND 9.3.0 > # /usr/sbin/named > # uvm_fault(0xc5877b60, 0, 1) -> 0xe > fatal page fault in supervisor mode > trap type 6 code 0 eip c02d60df cs 9 eflags 10246 cr2 0 ilevel 7 > kernel: supervisor trap page fault, code=0 > Stopped in pid 12.2 (named) at netbsd:sa_getcachelwp+0x2f: movl > 0xc4(%ebx),%edx > db> tr > sa_getcachelwp(c5872588,c66e1f80,c65e3b5c,c02cb957,c66e1f82,0,c5872588,c03a4fa7,c66e1f80,0) > at netbsd:sa_getcachelwp+0x2f Ok, I'm confused. How was the kernel compiled? I'm guessing not DIAGNOSTIC... There are asserts that should make it clear as to what may be wrong here. > sa_switch(c6611c40,c0427797,1,c5864fa8,c04adcfc,c6611c40,c65e3bdc,c02b5ebf,0,0) > a t netbsd:sa_switch+0x2a6 > sleepq_block(0,0,c0427797,c0449770,c58725ac,0,c65e3bfc,0,c04add74,c5872588) > at netbsd:sleepq_block+0x138 > cv_wait(c58725ac,c5864f3c,0,c03a4fa7,c6611c40,ffffffff,0,c03a4fa7,c6611dd0,c6611c40) > at netbsd:cv_wait+0xef > sigexit(c6611c40,b,b,0,c06f6f90,0,c6611dc0,0,0,0) at netbsd:sigexit+0x17e Looks like there's an issue here too. This is a silly time to be firing off a "BLOCKED" upcall. > postsig(b,c65e3d00,c65e3cac,c0399293,c661d010,b,c66e0fa0,c5872588,c6611c40,c65e3d30) > at netbsd:postsig+0xfd > lwp_userret(c6611c40,c65e3d00,c65e3da0,2,fffffffc,1,c65e3d2c,b93ffcd8,4,0) at > netbsd:lwp_userret+0x168 > trap() at netbsd:trap+0x4c8 > --- trap (number 4) --- > 0xbbbe60a9: Take care, Bill
Attachment:
pgpSH6lGvocPP.pgp
Description: PGP signature