[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:09:21PM +0200, Havard Eidnes wrote:
> > > As far as I understand it, such a change would *in practice*
> > > force a synchronized upgrade of both kernel and user-land
> > > (mostly due to "dragged-along dependencies"),
> > It should only force kernel+libc+libpthread (and, really, libc
> > +libpthread should probably be just in a single library).
> That's the theory, and why I said *in practice* above. If I
> recall correctly, practice has shown that as things stand now,
> more libraries will need to be upgraded.
Also, updating libc is not acceptable if the goal is to build
4.0-compatible binaries in a chroot. Which is one of the use cases we
David A. Holland
Main Index |
Thread Index |