[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Problem with raidframe: bad disk or bad memory, how to tell?
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 03:20:21PM -0700, Brian Buhrow wrote:
> Hello. Well, thanks for the tip. Perhaps this sheds some light on
> the problem. If I run fsck on wd0, the disk attached to channel 0, it
> reads good. If I do a similar check on wd1, the disk attached to channel 1,
> all reads good as long as there's no activity on wd0. However, if there's
> activity on both disks simultaneously, wd1 will give corrupt data.
> Is this a sign that the ATA controller is toast? This isn't a new machine,
> and it has been running in production for a good while.
> Here's how the ATA buses and disks probe:
It could be an issue with the disk controller (toast, or it has a
silicon bug); but it could also be a power supply issue: it may not
be strong enough to power both disks at the same time
Manuel Bouyer, LIP6, Universite Paris VI.
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
Main Index |
Thread Index |