Re: uhci on non-x86

[Michael Lorenz <macallan%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

On May 13, 2008, at 21:02, Brian Buhrow wrote:

>         Hello.  It certainly is true that on my 4.0-stable systems, and on my
> 3.x based systems, files written to umass devices over the ehci(4)  
> driver
> produces garbage.  Ohci and uhci connected devices work fine.
> (This is on I386 based systems.)  My point here is that I think the  
> ehci(4)
> driver is broken everywhere, including on I386 systems.

Who made your ohci/ehci chip? I had one made by ALi which never  
worked reliably while others, made by NEC, work just fine.

have fun
Michael

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)

iQEVAwUBSCpVpspnzkX8Yg2nAQLaFwgAhx7voCPJwV0WjanP8T7G/FT3gX8JhqZk
tSbzRK/7Xz2B0LFjLjRhCrMXO7lcPf7BW7+mlRYd5nRt//YsmHY7VLxs8ksfL9XH
hW3c3TmtTGMMo9yOmBK7rNrDQfOAiXLx9i8szLrnqsjWGe50Xrkx/kt1lwFRjQ3m
CF4eJ24/YCEM6+zBPmYEKws9rQAQk6gh5yiRBCVBWoSSUvFJuLZUrVD2OZjbOpU5
6QX8B222o5DK/CLp8hi1rwa0+TTHHZFtboofH1m7XLtKUakQ41S8/pef7WwkxvP3
4JOkJGBankA8v4piSjTxhuRFoNbTNlDJwQxwHK5f4KtFDY8WY3TRWA==
=PoVK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----