Re: uhci on non-x86

[Michael Lorenz <macallan%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

On May 13, 2008, at 21:11, Jared D. McNeill wrote:

> Brian Buhrow wrote:
> > 	Hello.  It certainly is true that on my 4.0-stable systems, and  
> > on my
> > 3.x based systems, files written to umass devices over the ehci(4)  
> > driver
> > produces garbage.  Ohci and uhci connected devices work fine.
> > (This is on I386 based systems.)  My point here is that I think  
> > the ehci(4)
> > driver is broken everywhere, including on I386 systems.
>
> FWIW, I rebuilt GNOME and modular xorg (and all related  
> dependencies) via pkgsrc about 3 times on an old 8GB USB drive via  
> ehci on i386 (before the drive itself died) on -current. I wouldn't  
> be so quick to jump to conclusions :-)

Yeah, the same disk that failed on sgimips with uhci/ehci worked just  
fine with ohci/ehci on sparc64 and macppc.

have fun
Michael

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)

iQEVAwUBSCpVMspnzkX8Yg2nAQINMQgAkZ5QZaLC18ljbiUzXGP85DKbHK2hcRDQ
AdyuODtOBj/gNVEqB3/SdOSckZGt/Pwv2zzZueAuogKd2P5d2GatCy6iwWkqH05c
9HLe9m0unaB+jdaRR/ycZZFCyZMOxzkfurxaJF+7TU8gp16AelIk1Walh46DjibF
+dc+oS7ONTdT3q674XeBarg2GNpMQ/FXHeDz4JA1c+Glmi3g1Z/PQnhrmbKJ7fwb
JQdyD7PvmOX6ZiloTxNPkiufvb3+jstDBtFubSc6mLOZ444rgtFfT/C/mW7dYP0/
VwpjEW3jjbFLQ+fv1tgHT9nVNx9vls9rgLnpMT71yKBLyTJacTOaMA==
=Ybwk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----