Brian Buhrow wrote:
I'm currently using 2048 but I could try bumping this up to 4096. I've been running some heavy tests for the past few weeks and only seen this problem once so I'll make the change and hold thumbs :)hello. I should add that I mis-typed the sysctl name, it's kern.mbuf.nmbclustersand that using OPTIONS NMBCLUSTERS=2048or some equally high number in my kernels has been something I've been doing for 10 years. When ever I've stopped using that option, figuring it must be out of date by now, I get bitten at some point. good luck. -Brian
Thanks Stuart