[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: mjf-devfs2 branch
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:31:41 -0400 (EDT)
der Mouse <mouse%Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA@localhost> wrote:
> >>> * dctl: the devfs control device node [...]
> >> The first names coming to my mind when thinking about a control
> >> node would be "devfsctl" or "devctl". Why did you choose dctl?
> > "devfsctl" seems rather long, "devctl" seems ok but we aren't really
> > controlling devices. I don't particularly care what it's called. If
> > a few more people pick one of your choices, I'll switch.
> I think I'd pick devfsctl. This is not something people will be
> typing regularly, so I can't see that length makes much difference;
> to me, it is by far outweighed by the clarity of devfsctl vs dctl or
> even devctl.
I agree. "devctl" sounds more generic. If you really can't deal with
the extra two letters, use dfsctl, but I'd prefer devfsctl.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
Main Index |
Thread Index |