tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: pmf_device_register() vs pmf_device_register1()

To: tech-kern%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: pmf_device_register() vs pmf_device_register1()
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:13:57 +0100

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 06:29:41PM +0100, Matthias Drochner wrote:
> But first the APIs should stabilize - changes to
> CFATTACH_DECL affect the whole tree.

The problem is not so much changing CFATTACH_DECL, the main problem is
distinguishing drivers that don't support it.

Joerg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: pmf_device_register() vs pmf_device_register1()
  - From: Matthias Drochner

References:
- pmf_device_register() vs pmf_device_register1()
  - From: Juan RP
- Re: pmf_device_register() vs pmf_device_register1()
  - From: Matthias Drochner

Prev by Date: Re: pmf_device_register() vs pmf_device_register1()
Next by Date: Re: pmf_device_register() vs pmf_device_register1()
Previous by Thread: Re: pmf_device_register() vs pmf_device_register1()
Next by Thread: Re: pmf_device_register() vs pmf_device_register1()
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index