Re: pmf_device_register() vs pmf_device_register1()

[Juan RP <juan%xtrarom.org@localhost>]

On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:29:41 +0100
Matthias Drochner <M.Drochner%fz-juelich.de@localhost> wrote:

> 
> juan%xtrarom.org@localhost said:
> > I suppose that pmf_device_register1() is a temporary solution and will
> > be made the default solution in the future? 
> 
> It is temporary.
> 
> I'd prefer to connect the suspend/resume/shutdown function
> pointers to "struct cfattach", directly or indirectly.
> This would save the calls to register these, and one would't
> have to take care to deregister at detach time.
> Also, with some creative use of cpp, one could more easily
> deselect unneeded features, for embedded platforms or so.

No idea about this stuff, but I really like your suggestion
about using function pointers in cfattach for them.

Cheers,
-- 
Juan Romero Pardines             The NetBSD Project
http://plog.xtrarom.org/         NetBSD/pkgsrc news in Spanish
http://mklivecd.xtrarom.org/     Make your own NetBSD Live CD/DVD!