Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/utils/sysinst

[Tom Spindler <dogcow%babymeat.com@localhost>]

>    > >- kernfs is hosed at the moment and nothing appears to rely on it any
>    > >  more so disable it. (IPsec did at one point, IIRC).
>    > 
>    > Huh? And what about /kern/xen? Did I miss something lately?
>    
>    Should the /kern/xen stuff be moved into /proc, then? (/kern/xen ain't
>    mentioned in mount_kernfs(8)....)
> 
> exactly how is the /kern/xen stuff related to processes?

An excellent question. I have no idea what /kern/xen does.

However, given that the recent changes to /proc turn on the linux
stuff by default (which includes things like cpuinfo, mounts, and
other non strictly-process related information), I don't think it'd
be that much of a stretch to put whatever /kern/xen does in /proc.
(I could be completely misguided as to the nature of /kern/xen,
admittedly.)