Re: CVS commit: syssrc

[Ross Harvey <ross%teraflop.com@localhost>]

> From source-changes-owner%netbsd.org@localhost Tue Sep 14 16:01:44 1999
> From: Simon Burge <simonb%netbsd.org@localhost>
> To: itojun%netbsd.org@localhost
> Cc: source-changes%netbsd.org@localhost
> Subject: Re: CVS commit: syssrc 
> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 08:58:07 +1000
>
> Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote:
>
> > Module Name:        syssrc
> > Committed By:       itojun
> > Date:               Mon Sep 13 10:31:44 UTC 1999
> > 
> > [[ the new sh3 files ]]
>
> Out of idle curiosity, would it have been better/easier/cleaner to
> "cvs import" the sh3 stuff (or any other large collection of files)
> rather than "cvs add" them?
>
> Simon.
>

I would say "no". This isn't an import on a vendor branch, and it
certainly isn't easier, cvs import is an awkward command. But mainly,
isn't NetBSD the vendor here? :-)