However, there is one big list of paths, all tested in a single test case. It would not make sense to report the entire test case as skipped just because 1-3 of the many entries was ENODEV.
So, even more arguably, the test itself should/could be rewritten to check each path separately, and then the individual sysmon-minor paths can skip on ENODEV.
:) On Wed, 6 May 2015, Martin Husemann wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 07:43:02AM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:Arguably, the atf test include/t_paths could have been updated to check for the specific error ENODEV and treat that as a PASS.Minor nit: it should skip, not pass. Martin
------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: | | (Retired) | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee.com | | Kernel Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at netbsd.org | -------------------------------------------------------------------------