re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/atari/stand/installboot

[matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost>]

> | -fno-strict-aliasing in MD is acceptable compromise for me.
> 
> Until that stops working, or being available. I think we should
> let the majority decide what's appropriate.

if -fstrict-aliasing becomes the only option than we'll need a
few years to clean up the kernel.

ie, i don't think this is a real problem.

what's appropriate is having something that works, and that the
maintainers of the code accept.

i tend to agree with christos about what would be the best, but
i'm OK with tsutsui using an already heavily used flag to avoid
a problem in code he maintains.  i've often been unable to work
on a port-sparc specific issue because some change was not well
tested, so instead of advancing the state of the art, i'm stuck
playing catch up all the time.  i understand where he's coming
from.


.mrg.