Re: CVS commit: src/sys/netinet

[christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

On Dec 23,  4:03pm, chacon.james%gmail.com@localhost (James Chacon) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/netinet

| On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Christos Zoulas 
<christos%zoulas.com@localhost> wrot=
| e:
| > On Dec 23, =A03:10pm, chacon.james%gmail.com@localhost (James Chacon) wrote:
| > -- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/netinet
| >
| > | Think we should go ahead and add the codes for 0,4 and 5?
| >
| > Well, are the ones for 1 and 3 correct? I have really no opinion on this.
| > I would like to read up some more on the RFC and implementations first.
| >
| 
| As far as I can tell, yes. I was looking at other implementations and
| it appears the codes used universally are:
| 
| #define               ICMP_PHOTURIS_UNKNOWN_INDEX     0       /* unknown sec 
index */
| #define               ICMP_PHOTURIS_AUTH_FAILED       1       /* auth failed 
*/
| #define               ICMP_PHOTURIS_DECOMPRESS_FAILED 2       /* decompress 
failed */
| #define               ICMP_PHOTURIS_DECRYPT_FAILED    3       /* decrypt 
failed */
| #define               ICMP_PHOTURIS_NEED_AUTHN        4       /* no 
authentication */
| #define               ICMP_PHOTURIS_NEED_AUTHZ        5       /* no 
authorization */

Go for it then!

Thanks for looking into it.

christos