Re: CVS commit: src/sys/netinet

[James Chacon <chacon.james%gmail.com@localhost>]

On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Christos Zoulas 
<christos%zoulas.com@localhost> wrote:
> On Dec 23,  3:10pm, chacon.james%gmail.com@localhost (James Chacon) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/netinet
>
> | Think we should go ahead and add the codes for 0,4 and 5?
>
> Well, are the ones for 1 and 3 correct? I have really no opinion on this.
> I would like to read up some more on the RFC and implementations first.
>

As far as I can tell, yes. I was looking at other implementations and
it appears the codes used universally are:

#define         ICMP_PHOTURIS_UNKNOWN_INDEX     0       /* unknown sec index */
#define         ICMP_PHOTURIS_AUTH_FAILED       1       /* auth failed */
#define         ICMP_PHOTURIS_DECOMPRESS_FAILED 2       /* decompress failed */
#define         ICMP_PHOTURIS_DECRYPT_FAILED    3       /* decrypt failed */
#define         ICMP_PHOTURIS_NEED_AUTHN        4       /* no authentication */
#define         ICMP_PHOTURIS_NEED_AUTHZ        5       /* no authorization */

(That comes from libdnet icmp.h)

James