Source-Changes-D archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: CVS commit: src

pooka@ wrote:

> > > additionally, userland is built with MKSOFTFLOAT=yes,
> > In that case, shouldn't we have different ${MACHINE_ARCH}
> > for different binaries?
> i think you're right.  hmm, looking at the build cluster output there
> seem to be very few sets shared between mips archs (i don't know the
> details of how they are selected).

base and comp can't be shared due to <machine/disklabel.h> etc.
On the other, packages binaries are seriously affected.

> Do you have a naming suggestion?  mipsebsf?

hpcmips chose and implemented painful fpemul to avoid such discussion,
IIRC :-)

It looks eb/el should be suffix, but probably we should check
other OSes and misc configure scripts etc.

> should the mips64 archs be
> renamed to follow the same convention?

Only if we will also have non-softfloat mips64?
(as sh3 has only softfloat currently)
Izumi Tsutsui

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index