[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 02:09:16AM +0300, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote:
> > Anyway, the reason this whole thread started out with /var/lock is
> > that the Linux world apparently also did this with /var/spool/lock.
> But our /var/spool/lock is specifically uucp's lockdir (uucp/daemon).
> Creating lvm subdir beneath is (owned by operator) feels monumentally
Bleh. Yeah, ok, I dunno then. Adding /var/lock seems like a decent
approach (and maybe we should get rid of /var/spool/lock, since we
removed base uucp quite a whle back...)
David A. Holland
Main Index |
Thread Index |