[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: src/usr.bin/make
David Holland <dholland-sourcechanges%netbsd.org@localhost> writes:
> > Again, I think that if one wanted to be serious about
> > this, one would need to have manual management of version
> > numbers.
> Anyhow, I talked to sjg about this and the conclusion is that
> MAKE_VERSION does need
Is this a real need? Anyway...
> For now the makefile should pass a fixed date stamp (may as well go
> with 20090326) and at some future point we can move this out of the
> makefile and create a version.h for it.
I'd would create a version.h right now, it would be simple enough.
> The version should be bumped when new language features are added,
> akin to config(1)'s version.
> Do you want to do this or should I?
I don't see the real usefulness of the thing, but it doesn't seem like
it will cause any real harm so so long as it doesn't incorporate the
If you want it and you're willing to do the work, go for it.
Perry E. Metzger perry%piermont.com@localhost
Main Index |
Thread Index |