Port-xen archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: what builds and what doesn't - worse than I expected



On 14/05/14 12:56, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 09:51:42AM -0700, John Nemeth wrote:
>>
>> On May 14, 10:25am, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
>> } On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 07:17:59PM -0700, John Nemeth wrote:
>> } > On May 13,  3:58pm, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> } > } 
>> } > } The HOWTO is out of date, and I wanted to make sure the right thing was
>> } > } recommended.   My take is that the right recommendation now is
>> } > } 
>> } > }    xen: 4.1
>> } > }    dom0: NetBSD 6 stable, amd64
>> } > } 
>> } > } except that maybe it should be 4.2.   I looked at package building
>> } > 
>> } >      Unless there is a very good reason to specify otherwise, I
>> } > would go with 4.2.  There were a number of positive reports about
>> } > it after I imported it.
>> } 
>> } I'm still using features from the xm toolstack which are not in xl in 4.2 
>> ...
>>
>>      And, what features are those?
> 
> for example, options to xm shutdown (I don't remember right now if it's -a
> or -w, I do use both)

This was added in 4.3 and backported to 4.2 at least:

http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2012-10/msg01103.html

Roger.



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index