Port-xen archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: TLS/lwp_private support

On 24 May 2010 09:11, Adam Hamsik <haaaad%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:
> On May,Monday 24 2010, at 8:46 AM, Pouya D. Tafti wrote:
>> I also tried the patch on an Intel Core i5 and had a similar
>> experience. ÂI could get further than before with 64-bit Linux
>> binaries coming from a 64-bit Linux partition mounted at /emul/linux
>> and ran with a fake raised kernel version. ÂGraphical programs
>> eventually failed because they could not connect to the X server,
>> complaining about the socket type being wrong for the protocol or
>> something similar (which I did not figure out how to get around). ÂBut
>> this was already quite promising, considering that with an unpatched
>> kernel they just dump core.
> CAn you ktrace this process and post output here ?

Sorry about my delay in responding.  Please find ktrace outputs for
unpatched and patched kernels attached.


Attachment: ktrace.out.chromium-unpatched
Description: Binary data

Attachment: ktrace.out.chromium-fsgs
Description: Binary data

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index