On 09/01/13 11:56 PM, Mouse wrote:
I don't think "the VAX Architecture Reference Manual" is a single thing. [...](My VARM is rev 6.1, of 1982-05-20, according to the cover.)Jeez. Get the new version! :-) [...] Your version was written before even the uVAX I...Thank you for making my point! :-)http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/dec/vax/archSpec/EL-00032-00-decStd32_Jan90.pdfSnagged. Thank you for the pointer. Even without OCR, this is going to be an interesting read.
I've never seen a document improved by OCR. Seen plenty ruined beyond salvation. They should outlaw it.
The older a book is, the better typeset it is, and scanning it is the best outcome.
Just imho as a typographer, of course. --T
/~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML mouse%rodents-montreal.org@localhost / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B