[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Sun Blade 100 vs Ultra 60
* On 2008-02-10 at 20:55 GMT, Al - image hosting services wrote:
> Looking at the Sun Blade 100, it is a small pci based machine.
> The Ultra 60 looks like a better system and should easily be able to hold
> 4 drives, although it would be more exspensive to colo.
Neither are suitable for colo, you should look at either Netra X1 (IDE) or
T1 (SCSI) for bog-standard 1u servers. These are dirt-cheap on ebay
nowadays, and include LOM whereas the Blade 100/U60 don't (somewhat handy
for colo :-)
Upwards in spec from the X1 is v100, from T1 is v120, then if you want to
spend a bit more you can go for a v210 or similar. All are 1U and perfect
for colo, plus run NetBSD fine (although -current has some important
> Also, is there a firmware limit on the size of a drive that could be put
> in it?
Possibly, I _think_ the X1 (and therefore the Blade 100, they use the same
IDE chipset) has a 48bit LBA limit, so I opted to put 120G drives in my X1
which work fine.
Jonathan Perkin The NetBSD Project
Main Index |
Thread Index |