Re: p9100 bug?

[der Mouse <mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost>]

>> sys/dev/sbus/p9100.c (1.34) includes a macro PNOZZ_LATCH [...]
>> Is this dead code (and thus removal-worthy), or should the
>> assignment to sc_last_offset in PNOZZ_LATCH be outside the if rather
>> than inside?
> No, but the == should be an !=.

!!  Okay, it makes a bit more sense now.  (Doesn't seem to be necessary
in practice, though, given how basically working the p9100 is.)  Should
I send-pr this or something?

I really need to convert that PDF into something usable so I have a
decent stab at figuring these things out on my own....

/~\ The ASCII                             Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML                mouse%rodents-montreal.org@localhost
/ \ Email!           7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B