[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Lemote Yeeloong observations
In article <Pine.NEB.4.64.1205092317360.6809%david.technoskunk.fur@localhost>,
John D. Baker <jdbaker%mylinuxisp.com@localhost> wrote:
>On Fri, 4 May 2012, John D. Baker wrote:
>> Running 'visudo', however, resulted in a bus error. This might be the
>> same thing discussed recently with sudo, sparc, and 64-bit time_t that
>> has been fixed in pkgsrc-HEAD. I'll update and build "security/sudo"
>> and give it a try.
>The updated "security/sudo" runs without problems. Adapting the patch
>to "wip/sudo" allows it to work as well. It would appear that although
>built as "evbmips64-el", userland is actually 32-bit? That would seem
>to explain the behavior similar to sparc which doesn't occur on sparc64.
>There appears to be a problem with pty allocation--at least as far as
>'sshd' is concerned. Attempting to connect to the Yeeloong (LOONGSON
>kernel) hangs at the client end and produces the following on console:
> sshd[pid]: error: do_exec_pty: Dup #1: Bad file descriptor
>I have the standard complement of /dev/pty??. Is ptyfs required instead?
You don't need PTYFS if your kernel has COMPAT_BSDPTY.
ktrace it and see what it is trying to dup
>Also, running 'ntpd' produces a regular cascade of:
> ntpd[pid]: step-systime: Invalid argument
>Not sure what this indicates. Is 'clockctl' not included? I'll have
>to check the kernel config.
Something is wrong with the ioctl? ktrace it.
Main Index |
Thread Index |