Re: odd -J complaint from make on netbsd-11

[Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>]

Thanks for looking at this.

I think where we are is:

  double stack trace bug fixed in current, not pulled up

  agreement in concept that it would be nice if $(MAKE) etc in a
  variable which is in a rule is like .MAKE, but nothing has been
  committed (not a complaint)



I have one remaining confusion: is the complaint from the parent make
that it is passing -J to a child, or is in from the child?   If the
parent knows it is invoking a submake, why does it object that it's not
marked, when it attempts to mark it automatically?