pkgsrc-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: wip/pkgchkxx: a complete reimplementation of pkg_chk and pkg_rolling-replace



Tha would be great, if it worked for me...

> Am 22.07.2023 um 11:54 schrieb PHO <pho%cielonegro.org@localhost>:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I just created a new package wip/pkgchkxx. This is a complete reimplementation of pkgtools/pkg_chk and pkgtools/pkg_rolling_replace in C++17.
>

Is this the intended behaviour?
----
# pkg_admin set rebuild=YES xxhash
# pkgrrxx -v
RR> Checking for mismatched installed packages (mismatch=YES)
RR> Checking for rebuild-requested installed packages (rebuild=YES)
RR> Checking for unsafe installed packages (unsafe_depends=YES)
RR> Building dependency graph for installed packages
RR> Packages to rebuild:
rr> MISMATCH_TODO=[pkgrrxx:
—
that should have rebuilt xxhash, shouldn’t it?
—
# pkgrrxx -vu
RR> Checking for mismatched installed packages using pkg_chk
^C
——
I thought it would use pkgchkxx for searching mismatched packages.  But that is quite ok, because it would probably have upgraded my mailman to mailman3:
# pkgchkxx -N
ImageMagick: ImageMagick-7.1.1.14
MesaLib: MesaLib-23.1.4
aspell-nb: aspell-nb-2.0.10
dbus: dbus-1.14.8
glu: glu-9.0.3
gtar-base: gtar-base-1.35
libgit2: libgit2-1.7.0
llvm: llvm-16.0.6 [wip]
mailman: mailman-3.3.5
ocaml: ocaml-5.0.0
openssl: openssl-3.0.7
py-cython: py-cython-3.0
py-pspdfutils: py-pspdfutils-3.0.8
re2c: re2c-3.1
sudo: sudo-1.9.14p2

But it is blazingly fast…
Note: I do have an outdated pkg_summary.gz.  When removing this, nothing changes ;-)

Cheers
	Oskar

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index