Re: wxGTK 28 vs 30?

[Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>]

Thomas Klausner <tk%giga.or.at@localhost> writes:

>> So my question is really:
>> 
>>   Should we just change the default to 30?  How much trouble would that
>>   cause?
>> 
>> and my new question is:
>> 
>>   Are we willing to assume the wxGTK variants will be parallel
>>   installable, and if so, should each package just pick the best one,
>>   and we get rid of this wxGTK.mk, or at least ignore it for a bit?
>
> I grepped, and this wxGTK is only used by two packages anyway.
>
> graphics/extrema
> ham/trustedQSL
>
> I suggest switching these to wxGTK30 (if it works) or wxGTK28 (if not)
> and removing the mk fragment.

OK - I'll do that.  Agreed that this seems too complicated for no good
reason.