pkgsrc-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: biology/openbabel seems to require lower gcc version

To: Jason Bacon <outpaddling%yahoo.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: biology/openbabel seems to require lower gcc version
From: maya%netbsd.org@localhost
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2019 09:08:01 +0000

On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 08:06:57AM -0500, Jason Bacon wrote:
> I'm all for removing other unnecessary patches.  Is this looking for a
> compiler newer than the year 2011??
> 
> +#if defined(_MSC_VER) || defined(_LIBCPP_VERSION) || __cplusplus>=201103L

The year-thingie is for C++11 (2011).

References:
- biology/openbabel seems to require lower gcc version
  - From: Mayuresh
- Re: biology/openbabel seems to require lower gcc version
  - From: Jason Bacon
- Re: biology/openbabel seems to require lower gcc version
  - From: Mayuresh
- Re: biology/openbabel seems to require lower gcc version
  - From: Jason Bacon

Prev by Date: netsurf bug: shall we downgrade the pkgsrc version
Next by Date: Re: netsurf bug: shall we downgrade the pkgsrc version
Previous by Thread: Re: biology/openbabel seems to require lower gcc version
Next by Thread: archivers/szip license
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index