Le 01/05/2018 à 21:03, Joerg Sonnenberger a écrit : > On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 06:28:17PM +0200, Nils Ratusznik wrote: >> We could have some generic meta-packages to handle basic use-cases : >> * Apache + mod_php ; >> * Apache + php-fpm ; >> * Nginx + php-fpm ; >> * Lighthttpd + php-fpm. > > Again, why does it need to be a meta-package? It does not. Counting the number of meta-packages for that idea was a way to demonstrate it was not a great idea. I guess my way of demonstrating it wasn't great either... > >> It's 2018 : people use configuration management systems and automation >> tools to install a web server and its application(s). I'm in favor of >> removing any web server dependency (unless there is a good reason) from >> a web application. We could, as a courtesy and in order to help >> newcomers, add configuration snippets in the example directory. With >> some luck, some web application projects already provide them ! > > Yes, there should be no dependency on mod_php or php-fpm or whatever in > wordpress or any other PHP application. It doesn't serve a purpose other > than artifical restrictions. I'm not sure I'm following you here. Do you mean web applications should have no dependency at all ? Or just webserver/mod_php/php-fpm (meaning it should still depends on modules, e.g. php-gd) ? Nils
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature