[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: MesaLib and llvm
>> I would rather depend on llvm and remove libLLVM as it entirely useless.
> That's completely false. libLLVM is significantly smaller, the main llvm
> package doesn't include all the support glue e.g. for cmake either.
I beg to differ.
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 43970528 Mar 22 12:28 /dist/pkg/lib/libLLVM.dylib
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 44233996 Mar 22 12:54 /dist/pkg/lib/libLLVM/libLLVM.dylib
And both have the same cmakes.
So, having additional libLLVM:
- provides redundant functionality;
- occupies unnecessary disk space (proving a user has both lang/llvm and lang/libLLVM installed);
- makes bulk builds slower;
- requires additional maintenance when update arrives.
Concluding, I opt for annihilating lang/libLLVM. :)
Main Index |
Thread Index |