Re: devel or mk readline

["OBATA Akio" <obache%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 22:45:00 +0900, Patrick Welche <prlw1%cam.ac.uk@localhost> 
wrote:

> In that case, I don't understand:
>
> revision 1.24
> date: 2013/07/17 21:22:40;  author: adam;  state: Exp;  lines: +4 -4
> Distfile got changed (licence clause in mans). Revision bump.
> Don't use mk/readline.buildlink3.mk! Must be devel/readline/buildlink3.mk!
>
> which is from mysql55-client, which I looked at when trying to fix the
> MySQL two different source tarballs with the same name problem for
> mysql56-client.
>
> Leaving the mk/readline.buildlink3.mk alone, I get for mysql56-client
>
> $ ldd /usr/pkg/bin/mysql
> /usr/pkg/bin/mysql:
>         -lpthread.1 => /usr/lib/libpthread.so.1
>         -lgcc_s.1 => /usr/lib/libgcc_s.so.1
>         -lc.12 => /usr/lib/libc.so.12
>         -ledit.3 => /usr/lib/libedit.so.3
>         -lterminfo.1 => /lib/libterminfo.so.1
>         -lz.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1
>         -lssl.10 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.10
>         -lcrypto.8 => /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.8
>         -lcrypt.1 => /lib/libcrypt.so.1
>         -lstdc++.7 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.7
>         -lm.0 => /usr/lib/libm.so.0
>
> So, libedit seems OK. Should that bit of the mysql55-client patch be
> reverted? What was the problem?

For me (NetBSD-5.2), cmake will fail to detect libedit,
so perhaps editline>=3.0 may be required for mysql.

devel/editline/builtin.mk should detect builtin editline version...

--
OBATA Akio / obache%NetBSD.org@localhost