[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

**To**:**pkgsrc-users%NetBSD.org@localhost****Subject**:**Re: Make g95 optional in math/fftw****From**:**Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>**- Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 15:33:50 +0200

On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 02:44:16PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote: > The package defines USE_LIBTOOL and has "fortran77" in USE_LANGUAGES. > But the fortran libtool package supports fortran95 only. The core of the issue is that you can't really mix different Fortran implementations. libtool depends on fortran to provide a useful environment by default, since e.g. R and many other packages just fail with Fortran77 implementations like f2c. At this point, I think the separation in this form is not helpful. If you want to force f2c as Fortran implementation, it should be one switch only. Joerg

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: Make g95 optional in math/fftw***From:*Greg Troxel

**References**:**Make g95 optional in math/fftw***From:*Martin Husemann

**Re: Make g95 optional in math/fftw***From:*Thomas Klausner

- Prev by Date:
**Re: Make g95 optional in math/fftw** - Next by Date:
**Re: Make g95 optional in math/fftw** - Previous by Thread:
**Re: Make g95 optional in math/fftw** - Next by Thread:
**Re: Make g95 optional in math/fftw** - Indexes: