[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

**To**:**pkgsrc-users%NetBSD.org@localhost****Subject**:**Re: math/blas and math/lapack broken: cannot find -lf95****From**:**Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>**- Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 01:10:04 +0200

On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 07:49:39AM +0900, Ryo ONODERA wrote: > If fortran and fortran77 should use same compiler, what is the mean of > having separate compiler options, fortran and fortran77. Until recently, requiring a separate compiler would have been way too heavy for something like devel/libtool-base, which is needed by almost anything else. Now that Fortran is split off, the situation is much less dramatic. If someone really only wants to use Fortran77, f2c is good enough, but given e.g. the inability to build R with it, I find that a bad default choice. Joerg

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: math/blas and math/lapack broken: cannot find -lf95***From:*Ryo ONODERA

**References**:**Re: math/blas and math/lapack broken: cannot find -lf95***From:*Joerg Sonnenberger

**Re: math/blas and math/lapack broken: cannot find -lf95***From:*Thomas Klausner

**Re: math/blas and math/lapack broken: cannot find -lf95***From:*Joerg Sonnenberger

**Re: math/blas and math/lapack broken: cannot find -lf95***From:*Ryo ONODERA

- Prev by Date:
**Re: math/blas and math/lapack broken: cannot find -lf95** - Next by Date:
**Re: math/blas and math/lapack broken: cannot find -lf95** - Previous by Thread:
**Re: math/blas and math/lapack broken: cannot find -lf95** - Next by Thread:
**Re: math/blas and math/lapack broken: cannot find -lf95** - Indexes: