[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

**To**:**Ryo ONODERA <ryo_on%yk.rim.or.jp@localhost>, pkgsrc-users%NetBSD.org@localhost, adam%NetBSD.org@localhost****Subject**:**Re: math/blas and math/lapack broken: cannot find -lf95****From**:**Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>**- Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 22:09:38 +0200

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 05:21:37PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote: > On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 03:12:44PM +0900, Ryo ONODERA wrote: > > Old libtool-base has > > > > USE_LANGUAGES= c c++ fortran77 > > > > in its Makefile. > > And libtool-fortran has > > > > USE_LANGUAGES= c c++ fortran > > > > in its Makefile. > > > > Should the following patch be committed? > > Thank you, I've committed a similar patch. Thanks for honouring OWNER. Please revert, the dependency on fortran was intentional. Joerg

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: math/blas and math/lapack broken: cannot find -lf95***From:*Thomas Klausner

**References**:**math/blas and math/lapack broken: cannot find -lf95***From:*Thomas Klausner

**Re: math/blas and math/lapack broken: cannot find -lf95***From:*Ryo ONODERA

**Re: math/blas and math/lapack broken: cannot find -lf95***From:*Ryo ONODERA

**Re: math/blas and math/lapack broken: cannot find -lf95***From:*Thomas Klausner

- Prev by Date:
**Re: /net./bind99 for NetBSD 4.0.1** - Next by Date:
**Re: math/blas and math/lapack broken: cannot find -lf95** - Previous by Thread:
**Re: math/blas and math/lapack broken: cannot find -lf95** - Next by Thread:
**Re: math/blas and math/lapack broken: cannot find -lf95** - Indexes: