[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Can we get rid of fvwm1?
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 4:26 AM, David Holland
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 05:12:17PM -0400, Julio Merino wrote:
> > While looking at upgrading fvwm to the latest 2.6.x release, I found
> > that the package is way more complicated than it should be due to the
> > fact that we attempt to allow the installation of the old fvwm1 along
> > the newer 2.x versions. I could understand the need for this years
> > ago, but not today.
> I don't see any reason to need both of them installed at once, really...
Heh, actually, what I said was incorrect. The two packages cannot be
installed at once any more: they have explicit conflicts entries.
Therefore... I wonder why there is so much complexity in these
packages; maybe it's just because at one point they'd be installed
side by side but not any more. Anyway, will see if I have the time to
Julio Merino / @jmmv
Main Index |
Thread Index |