On 24/08/2012 9:13 PM, Ryo ONODERA wrote:
Hi, From: Ian McWilliam <kaosagnt%tpg.com.au@localhost>, Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 20:37:10 +1000On 24/08/2012 8:03 PM, Ryo ONODERA wrote:From: David Brownlee <abs%netbsd.org@localhost>, Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 08:56:15 +0100On 23 August 2012 05:06, Ryo ONODERA <ryo_on%yk.rim.or.jp@localhost> wrote:Hi, I have a plan to update www/apache24 to 2.4.3. With this update, I will meke --enable-mpms-shared='event prefork worker' default. Then www/apache24 lacks mod_cgi.so module at all, of course mod_cgid.so exists. Any objection? I will update www/apache24 this weekend.What is the failure mode for someone with an existing mod_cgi using system - is it easy to determine that you need to switch to cgid?I am not user of mod_cgi.so module. But according to http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_cgi.html , mod_cgi.so and mod_cgid.co has same function. Perhaps someone who had used mod_cgi.so can modify LoadModule line only.(but in general I'm in favour :)-- Ryo ONODERA // ryo_on%yk.rim.or.jp@localhost PGP fingerprint = 82A2 DC91 76E0 A10A 8ABB FD1B F404 27FA C7D1 15F3I've used both mod_cgi and mod_cgid under apache 2.2 with no issues. Didn't even have to change any other configuration lines other than the change to use the different LoadModule as long as your happy with the the default location of the socket used by mod_cgid.Thank you.Chrooting apache my require further config changes with respect to the socket directory.What is the difference between default httpd.conf and your requirement? I have no plan to modify default httpd.conf, but I can write it into MESSAGE.
That should have read "Chrooting apache may require ....". I currently don't run in this config so no changes required.
Is there going to be a message about this change when installing apache 2.4 package?I will write announcement of mod_cgi.so retirement in MESSAGE.
Great.
Ian McWilliam-- Ryo ONODERA // ryo_on%yk.rim.or.jp@localhost PGP fingerprint = 82A2 DC91 76E0 A10A 8ABB FD1B F404 27FA C7D1 15F3
Ian McWilliam