[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: va_arg and netbsd-6 ...
At 23:44 Uhr +0200 15.06.2012, Martin Husemann wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 05:55:52PM +0200, Hauke Fath wrote:
>> Using %jd, with and without casting the argument to intmax_t, gave me the
>> same SIGSEV. Using %lld works, but is not backwards compatible. So it'll
>> probably be a PRItimet format along the lines of what they do for off_t.
>Huh? You mean something like:
> time_t t = 0;
> printf("%jd\n", (intmax_t)t);
>caused a SIGSEGV?
Not that simple, unfortunately. The SIGSEV happens in the following call
snet_writef( sn, "%s %s %o %d %d %ld %" PRIofft "d %s\r\n",
"f", av[ 2 ],
DEFAULT_MODE, DEFAULT_UID, DEFAULT_GID,
st.st_mtime, st.st_size, cksum_b64 );
-- libsnet's snet_writef() does not know %j, and the last %s then ends up
with the MSW (likely 0) of the 64 bit st_size field.
So, not NetBSD's fault... except that a "time_t migration guide" might be
The ASCII Ribbon Campaign Hauke Fath
() No HTML/RTF in email Institut für Nachrichtentechnik
/\ No Word docs in email TU Darmstadt
Respect for open standards Ruf +49-6151-16-3281
Main Index |
Thread Index |