Re: [10.0_STABLE] Hard lock

To: netbsd-users%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: [10.0_STABLE] Hard lock
From: mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost (Michael van Elst)
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 15:07:23 -0000 (UTC)

rokuyama.rk%gmail.com@localhost (Rin Okuyama) writes:

>https://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2023/12/28/msg149090.html
> > Use correct status value SCSI_BUSY (0x08) instead of XS_BUSY (7)...
>https://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2024/08/24/msg153012.html
> > Avoid race in timeout handling.
> > Don't try to wake up CCB without connection (which led to a NULL pointer
> > deref).

>Michael, can I request iSCSI ones before 10.1 release?

We can safely pull these up.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [10.0_STABLE] Hard lock
  - From: Rin Okuyama

References:
- Re: [10.0_STABLE] Hard lock
  - From: Taylor R Campbell
- Re: [10.0_STABLE] Hard lock
  - From: BERTRAND Joël
- Re: [10.0_STABLE] Hard lock
  - From: BERTRAND Joël
- Re: [10.0_STABLE] Hard lock
  - From: BERTRAND Joël
- Re: [10.0_STABLE] Hard lock
  - From: Rin Okuyama

Prev by Date: Re: Chap 35. Updating an existing system from sources (xorg?)
Next by Date: Re: Chap 35. Updating an existing system from sources (xorg?)
Previous by Thread: Re: [10.0_STABLE] Hard lock
Next by Thread: Re: [10.0_STABLE] Hard lock
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index