On Fri 19 Jun 2015 at 01:27:09 +0700, Robert Elz wrote: > Of course, if a drive develops bad spots, the single raidframe approach will > fail that drive, and none of the filesystems will be mirrored until the > drive is replaced or the bad spots corrected - the multiple raidframe approach > will only file the arrays where the bad spots occur, other filesystems > would remain mirrored. Which leads to the question: has this principle never been used in single-large-RAID setups? Like there is now some memory of which parts of the disk have parity that still needs to be rebuilt (right?), one could re-use the same zones and remember in which one of those there was a read error. > kre -Olaf. -- ___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert -- The Doctor: No, 'eureka' is Greek for \X/ rhialto/at/xs4all.nl -- 'this bath is too hot.'
Attachment:
pgpCBoS7WOq5X.pgp
Description: PGP signature